{"id":6690,"date":"2021-04-01T14:25:05","date_gmt":"2021-04-01T14:25:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/article\/federal-circuit-affirms-ptab-finding-of-patent-ineligibility-a-new-or-different-use-of-a-mathematical-process-is-still-a-mathematical-process-and-patent-ineligible-under-%c2%a7-101-2\/"},"modified":"2024-09-26T09:05:48","modified_gmt":"2024-09-26T09:05:48","slug":"federal-circuit-affirms-ptab-finding-of-patent-ineligibility-a-new-or-different-use-of-a-mathematical-process-is-still-a-mathematical-process-and-patent-ineligible-under-%c2%a7-101","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/article\/federal-circuit-affirms-ptab-finding-of-patent-ineligibility-a-new-or-different-use-of-a-mathematical-process-is-still-a-mathematical-process-and-patent-ineligible-under-%c2%a7-101\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Circuit affirms PTAB finding of patent ineligibility: a \u201cnew or different use of a mathematical process\u201d is still a mathematical process and patent ineligible under \u00a7 101 and <i>Alice<\/i>"},"featured_media":5309,"template":"","categories":[98],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/6690"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haugpartners.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}